I believe there are number of you are unaware of the existence of Youth Parliament in United Kingdom, a parliamentary democracy system which our country should look forward and nevertheless to take a lead in enhancing the democracy education policy among the youth.
UK Youth Parliament is just like a real Parliamentary system, a system which involving a campaigning and voting process. In order to become an eligible Member of Youth Parliament (MYP), he must be a resident of UK and aged between 11 and 18 years old. The voters are also the same category of youth as specified herein.
The MYPs have the opportunity to sit in the House of Commons (in our context it is refer to the "Dewan Rakyat") to debate issues that relate to the youth society across the UK, including Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. The constituency is divided according to the number of Local Education Authority (LEA). Each LEA represents a Youth Parliament Constituency.
There are over 250 MYPs in UK presently.
Since the Youth Parliament is given mandate by the UK government in terms of legality and legitimacy, the MYPs do enjoyed certain privileges as the "real MPs". During the term of office the MYP which represent his own constituency will have opportunities to meet the MP and discuss any issues or campaigns in relation to the constituency.
The most powerful feature of the Youth Parliament is the House of Commons Debate. The MYPs will sit in the House of Commons and debate 4 issues which will be voted by the youth through ballot box and additional 1 issue which is reserved for the Youth Parliament to decide on. Such broad system could ensure the participation of the youth within the country.
Further to that, there are numerous advantages arise from such system and nevertheless could crystallize the demands of the youth society into a focused atmosphere, if our country taking into consideration in implementing it:-
a) Enhancing Participatory Democracy
In Malaysia we have to be at least 21 years old and/or above to exercise our right through the ballot box, as provided under Article 119 Federal Constitution. In short, a Youth Parliament system would enable and empower the "underage" youth to enjoy a voting right. Going further, the youth will be getting a vital participation within the country's democracy system.
b) Sharpening Sensitivity on National Issues
A reflection from the UK Youth Parliament system has shown us the youth would need to identify and vote for the issues to be carried right to the House of Commons by the MYPs. Voters are one of the sources of democracy power and certainly they will vote for those issues in which are relate to them personally and even to the country. Thus, the youth will be "trained" in an indirect method under such system to identify those important issues and possibly takes further step to undertake personal research.
c) Creating Greater Constitutionalism
Despite the fact that the UK does not has a codified Constitution, we should be glad and proud to have a set of codified supreme law of the land to govern our country, instead of keep pointing all conflicts to the parliamentary supremacy. A well developed Youth Parliament system will create better awareness of Constitutionalism among the youth, regardless of the secular-islamic issue that has been politicized by the politicians, as an example. The youth will get to know further on how the separation of powers function governed under the Constitution, including the legislator (parliament) role and its power when they participate within this context.
It is worth to note the Ministry of Youth and Sports has actually initiated the implementation of youth parliament this year (2012) and the first sitting trial has took place in Palace of Golden Horses, Seri Kembangan. Although the members were selected based on self-registration or recommendation by political parties or NGOs, I wouldn't comment much on it due to its fresh starting but the government would need to give more mandate to the youth parliament but not use it as a tool for own propaganda.
A healthy nation democracy system could kick start with a youth parliament, where all the participants are the prospective voters and country leaders sooner or later. Let the youth learn how to in charge of their own country's democracy and I hope we could transform from representative democracy into direct participatory democracy someday!
Living like a tiger, strong and elegant. Living like a rose, tender but not fragile
Showing posts with label 国会. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 国会. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Thursday, October 14, 2010
国会里的民主精神
在下议院里,首相并不能被称呼为首相,反之,尊贵的他只能被称为北根区国会议员。但是,由于国阵众下议员长久以来的习惯都称之为首相,因此这个传统性的称呼依然延续至今。


许多民众依然误解国会议员的职务,更有不少人把国会议员召来指沟渠,看路灯。无可否认,国会议员当选也需要政治筹码,因此与当地民众一同看沟渠并无任何不妥。需了解的是,国会议员在国会的责任即对法案或任何关系国家利益的课题进行辩论或指责。保护民众与国家的利益。每当任何一方的国会议员需对某课题寻获解答,都必须提呈问题于下议院秘书处,交由下议院议长。
国阵沿用的传统文化,都是对己方欲通过的所有议案或法案一致赞同。国阵的议员对法案或课题的见解已被笼统的国阵精神牢控,似乎不能持反对立场,或与己方唱反调。在国会里,国会议员乃代表该区投选他/她的人民,在保护大众利益的情况底下,进行辩论。可惜的是,国阵议员都似乎为了通过而通过,为了支持而支持,失去国会议员在国会会议里应有的独立精神。
根据Doctrine of Collective Ministerial Responsibility,部长在内阁会议里可持有不同的意见,但基于显示团结的精神下,所有对外发表的言论都必须采用众人的多数决定,抑或最高领导的决定。可是,国会议员并不约束在此主义底下。
敦马时代的国会可谓毁了整个体制与国家宪法。由于国阵拥有超过2/3的议员,因此修宪并无大碍。所以从选区划分乃至司法与皇权体制,都通过2/3的国会议员进行修改,敦马真是无法无天。
民众仍有必要对两线制进行鼓吹与捍卫,因为在任何一方都没有超过2/3国会议员的情况底下,都不能随意修宪。当执政一方提出修宪的动议时,都必须获得对方的支持;换句话说,对方也只会在基于人民的利益底下而选择支持,不过这可不容易。
大马的国会会议素质有待提升,无论是朝野双方都必须秉持保护与捍卫人民利益的前提下进行辩论与投决,才是人民的国会。


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
